http://www.vimeo.com/7399243
Historian Simon Inglis has told Birmingham City Council it must act to save the historic Moseley Road Baths or risk losing a landmark of international significance.
Speaking at the Memories and Memorabilia event, organised by the Friends of Moseley Road Baths, the author laid out the case for preserving the Edwardian building, which has fallen into disrepair and now has only one of its two pools in use.
At a talk at the Methodist Church opposite the baths, he said: “There are only six pre Second World War baths that are Grade II-star listed, and Moseley Road is the only one that is still in use. It is no exaggeration to say that the building over the road is of enormous importance internationally.”
He explained that, due to its intact fittings, splendid architecture and remarkably preserved pools, it served as a unique example of how public baths had transformed health and hygiene in Victorian and Edwardian Britain. Since the UK had led the way in the development of modern swimming pools, Moseley Road was not just significant here, but in the rest of the world.
Designed by William Hale and opened in 1907, it has been the subject of huge debate since its main (Gala) pool was closed in 2003. While the Friends hope the Gala pool can be refurbished at a cost between £3million and £4million, Birmingham City Council is struggling with a funding black hole of £2.2billion and is yet to announce its plans for the baths.
The writer, born opposite Sparkhill pool, said it was time city planners took note of local feeling by doing everything they could to save the Moseley Road Baths and warned that handing it over to a not-for-profit trust – as the council is considering – might not be enough to save the facility. “It doesn’t free the local authority from bringing it up to scratch,” he said, adding that the full figure for its complete restoration could be in the region of £20million.
Pictures and video, including a tour of the baths and an interview with Simon Inglis, to follow shortly.
Popularity: 40% [?]